SARKO FRANCE > Soigne ta droite

>


>


hoje Sarkozy, o candidato da direita, foi eleito o novo presidente da França.
Sarkozy 52% _ Ségolène Royal (47%)

>



FIN (?)

IN GIRUM IMUS NOCTE ET CONSUMIMUR IGNI

In Girum Imus Nocte Et Consumimur Igni /Cerith Wyn Evans (1997)

CRUMB expo in Yerba Buena Center for the Arts _ US

R. Crumb’s Underground é a exposição que este importante criador ligado aos movimentos da contra-cultura americana dos anos 60 apresenta em San Francisco no Yerba Buena Center for the Arts (YBCA).
>
YBCA salutes local treasure R. Crumb with an eclectic exhibit of early work, collaborations old and new, and the world premiere of his “spool” drawings. Universally acknowledged as the founder of the underground comic scene, Crumb gained cult popularity for his pioneering Zap Comix and stardom with the Terry Zwigoff documentary Crumb. Extending far beyond comics, the YBCA exhibit shows how his work has grown in philosophical complexity, and highlights his collaborative work, including intimate confessions produced with wife Aline Kominsky-Crumb.
>
Yerba Buena Center for the Arts (YBCA) _ San Francisco _ US
Mar 17–Jul 8 _ 2007

prémio de arquitectura MIES VAN DER ROHE 2007 para MUSAC

O prémio para arquitectura contemporânea Mies van der Rohe 2007 foi atribuido ao MUSAC - Museo de arte contemporáneo de Castilla y León em Espanha com arquitectura de Luis M. Mansilla e Emilio Tuñón.
>
In contrast to other types of museums that focus on the exhibition of frozen historic collections, MUSAC is a living space that opens its doors to the wide-ranging manifestations of contemporary art. This is an art centre that constructs a set of chessboards on which the action is the protagonist of the space; a structure that develops from an open system, formed by a fabric of squares and rhombi, and permitting the construction of a secret geography of memory.MUSAC is a new space for culture, regarded as something that visualises the connections between man and nature.
(...)
In its size, as a single-storey building with white concrete walls and large coloured glazing seen from the outside, MUSAC strives to be a space where art is at ease and helps to erase the boundaries between private and public; between work and leisure; and between art and life.
(excertos do texto de apresentação do prémio)



Entre os finalista estava o projecto português do Centro de Artes de Sines de Francisco Aires Mateus e Manuel Aires Mateus e também um projecto de Zaha Hadid o Phaeno Science Centre em Wolfsburg na Alemanha, na imagem.

SERPENTINE GALLERY pavilhão 2007 de OLAFUR ELIASSON e KJECTIL THORSEN

The Serpentine Gallery has invited the world-famous artist Olafur Eliasson and the distinguished Norwegian architect Kjetil Thorsen, of the architectural practice Snøhetta, to collaborate on the 2007 Pavilion.
The Serpentine Gallery architectural commission is taking a step into the future by expanding the design team to include a visual artist. This will bring an extra dimension to the project that already holds a unique place in the innovation of architectural practice.
>
Danish-Icelandic artist Olafur Eliasson’s work explores the relationship between individual people and their surroundings, as experienced in his awe-inspiring large-scale installation The weather project, 2003, at Tate Modern. Eliasson is currently involved in numerous architectural projects internationally, including the Icelandic National Concert and Conference Centre in Reykjavik (design of the building envelope).
Kjetil Thorsen is co-founder of Snøhetta, one of Scandinavia’s leading architectural practices. Thorsen is responsible for the design of award-winning public buildings globally and has collaborated with Eliasson several times, including on the New National Opera House, Oslo, currently under construction. He is a founder of Galleri Rom, Oslo, and is also Professor at the Institute for Experimental Studies in Architecture at the University of Innsbruck, Austria. As in previous years Cecil Balmond, Deputy Chairman, Arup, and the Advanced Geometry Unit, led by Daniel Bosia, will lend invaluable assistance to the structural engineering and design of the Pavilion.

GORDON MATTA-CLARK expo Whitney Museum N.Y.

Exposição de Gordon Matta-Clark: ‘You Are the Measure’ no Whitney Museum of American Art em New York até 3 de Junho 07.
>
Gordon Matta-Clark (1943–1978) has attracted increasing interest over the past ten years. Thanks to monographic studies by Pamela M. Lee and Corinne Diserens, published in 2000 and 2003, respectively, and several recent exhibitions in San Diego and New York, Matta-Clark’s ten years of frenetic productivity are becoming known to a larger public. The show currently on view at the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York is, however, the first retrospective of Matta-Clark’s work since that held at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago, in 1985. The many objects on display include fragments from his celebrated cuttings and splittings of condemned buildings; photographs and photomontages of the results of these cuttings; drawings and sketches; notebook pages; index cards; and, of course, films of the more important actions.
(...)
A number of significant revelations emerge from such a comprehensive collection of material, particularly after so many partial glimpses of Matta-Clark’s work in previous shows. Among the most noteworthy of the items on display, especially given the difficulty of reconstructing the spatial nature of the buildings before and after cutting, are several large photomontages, which provide an almost filmic vision of Matta-Clark’s process. Particularly striking are the photomontages of the “Core” and “Datum” cuts of A W-Hole House, 1973, itself a beautiful exemplar of the complex geometrical nature of Matta-Clark’s actions, as he sliced horizontally and vertically through the square studio with its pyramidal roof. In an incisive catalogue essay exploring Matta-Clark’s relation to his father (the quasi-Surrealist artist Roberto Matta), as well as to architectural history and the “origins” of architecture in particular, Princeton professor of architecture Spyros Papapetros posits a parallel between a consideration of the conceptual nature of the Egyptian pyramids in the second volume of Sigfried Giedion’s Eternal Present (1964) and Matta-Clark’s use of the pyramid as “a median plane to invert his previous architectural education.” Papapetros’s argument is especially persuasive because the influence of Giedion’s earlier book, Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition (1941)—the central “set book” of the 1960s that saw the Baroque as the progenitor of the Modern Movement, the dramatic spatial geometries of the former transformed by the collapsing of space-time in the latter—can be felt in the cuttings Conical Intersect, 1975, and Office Baroque, 1977. The large color Cibachrome photocollages documenting the creation of Office Baroque might well be playful elaborations of Giedion’s premise, taking it literally but reversing the historical movement by returning the modern to its Baroque roots.
(...)

The works on view have frequently been adduced as evidence of his strong reaction against the architectural training he received at Cornell University, where he graduated with a professional degree in 1968. After all, cutting houses open with a Sawzall, shooting through windows with a BB gun (as he did at the Institute of Architecture and Urban Studies in New York for Window Blow-Out, 1976), and hammering conical holes through the party walls of Parisian apartment buildings have never been part of the orthodox practice of architecture. Nor were such actions in tune with the prevailing neo-avant-garde works of the time, whether the populist imagery of Robert Venturi and Denise Scott Brown, or the rationalist and post-Surrealist work of the New York Five, who represented the dominant tendency at Cornell in the ’60s.
(...)

Behind each of Matta-Clark’s architectural interventions lies a similar impulse: to seek the most fundamental transformation of architecture, one that would respond to the conditions of life rather than art, and certainly not one that followed the already static conventions of the neo-avant-garde. The action of bringing light into the house (in Splitting) might itself be the best metaphor for Matta-Clark’s “anarchitecture”: In the end, like his beloved alchemists, systems theorists, and psychologists, and together with the theorists, if not the practitioners, of modern architecture, Matta-Clark was an apostle of light—an “enlightener” in practice and in theory.
>
Anthony Vidler in ARTFORUM

JOÃO TABARRA conferência no IPF

ENCONTROS DO OLHAR_Fotografia e Arte
A obra de João Tabarra por João Tabarra

>

As imagens / trabalhos que João Tabarra produz, planeando-as até ao mais ínfimo detalhe, estão repletas de ícones, símbolos e outros elementos que, apesar de nos serem familiares, têm o seu potencial de significação minado pela forma como são alterados, reformulados, organizados e relacionados. A ambiguidade que daí resulta, para além do humor ou do burlesco que são evidentes num primeiro olhar, se enfatiza a impossibilidade da condição humana, também sublinha a essencialidade da sua vontade.
>
03 Maio _ 21h30
Instituto Português de Fotografia _ Porto
Rua da Vitória, nº 129

PETER SLOTERDIJK em SERRALVES

Peter Sloterdijk conferência "A técnica na sua relação com o humano".

Professor na Universidade de Karlsruhe, Alemanha, e um dos mais importantes pensadores da Razão política, social e cultural contemporânea, indispensável na análise das questões da técnica, na sua relação com o humano. Sloterdijk é o filósofo alemão mais conhecido depois de Habermas. Heterodoxo e provocador, o livro que o tornou famoso fora da Alemanha foi "Crítica da Razão Cínica", um tratado sobre a razão política, cultural e social contemporâneos. A questão da coexistência dos indivíduos nas sociedades modernas e o modo como operam a cultura e a civilização na construção social e na "domesticação do ser humano" ocuparam Sloterdijk na sua obra em vários volumes intitulada "Esferas". Um pequeno livro intitulado "Regras para o Parque Humano" valeu-lhe uma violenta polémica com Habermas que depois se alargou. O que causou escândalo nesse livro foi a utilização de um vocabulário que trazia pelo menos a memória da genética nazi. De qualquer modo (e é preciso ressalvar que Sloterdijk jamais se identificou com a ideologia nazi) esse livro é um dos contributos mais importantes do nosso tempo para discutir as questões da técnica, na sua relação com o humano.

>

CRÍTICA DO CONTEMPORÂNEO, CONFERÊNCIAS INTERNACIONAIS

Fundação de Serralves

dia 3 Maio _ 21:30 _ Auditório de Serralves

COCTEAU e EL TOPO em DVD

EL TOPO o filme realizado por Alejandro Jodorowsky em 1970 e que deu origem nos Estados Unidos aos filmes da meia noite foi finalmente editado em DVD.
>
(...)
During the 1960s, Jodorowsky travelled back and forth between Mexico and Paris. Greatly inspired by surrealism and determined to reinvigorate its artistic movement, Jodorowsky contacted André Breton in Paris, but was dismayed to find that Breton had become very conservative in his old age as surrealism became accepted and incorporated into high culture. While Breton still envisioned a poetic and fantastic movement, Jodorowsky was more influenced by elements of popular youth culture that Breton did not appreciate – such as rock music, science fiction, pornography and comic books – which would all factor into Jodorowsky's later work. Together with absurdist playwright (and later filmmaker) Fernando Arrabal and writer/artist/animator Roland Topor, Jodorowsky founded the “Panic Movement” in 1962 as a way to go beyond surrealism by embracing irrationality, the mysterious and the absurd, emphasising an explosive sexuality, a fearless sense of rebellion, and a collapsing of all time into the present moment. Named after the god Pan (meaning “totality”), the concept of a “Panic” artist also meant someone whose output was “polyvalent”, traversing many different media in order to avoid simple categorisation; artists like Cocteau, Leonardo da Vinci and Pier Paolo Pasolini were inspirations in this sense. Despite their general aesthetic, Jodorowsky maintains that the idea of a “Panic Movement” was largely a tongue-in-cheek joke for its three founders; each person created independently, labelling their own work as “Panic”, while they secretly laughed at serious attempts made by critics and other artists to theorise or follow the invented “movement”.
(...)
Speaking of El Topo (“The Mole”), he famously announced that “I ask of film what most North Americans ask of psychedelic drugs. The difference being that when one creates a psychedelic film, he need not create a film that shows the visions of a person who has taken a pill; rather, he needs to manufacture the pill.” El Topo is thus intended to be read as less a product of Jodorowsky's own mind than a process of spiritual illumination akin to the religious sensations experienced by many countercultural drug users; of course, this was helped by the film's eventual reputation as a “head film” during which many audience members did partake of such substances. Nevertheless, El Topo is in many ways Jodorowsky's personal quest toward an enlightened identity that can transcend death. The film opens with the titular gunfighter and his nude son (played by Jodorowsky and his son Brontis, respectively) riding across the desert, where the son is instructed to bury his first toy and his mother's picture now to become a man. Over the opening credits, we are told that the mole lives underground and searches for the sun; sometimes its journey brings it to the surface where it is blinded. After this central metaphor, the film is divided into four biblical sections: Genesis, Prophets, Psalms and Apocalypse. El Topo and his son ride into a blood-drenched town where bandits have raped and massacred hundreds. He kills these lascivious bandits, then finds their Colonel and his men in a Franciscan mission. El Topo announces “I am God” before castrating the Colonel (who then kills himself) and killing the rest of the motley junta. He then abandons his son to the care of the mission's surviving monks and rides off with a young woman named Mara who he has rescued. El Topo can live in the desert by miraculously summoning food and water from the ground, but Mara cannot – at least until El Topo rapes her to unleash her first orgasm. Mara then makes El Topo prove his love for her by killing the four Masters of the desert and becoming the best gunfighter. El Topo cheats his way into killing the first three Masters, who are all far more spiritually enlightened than him and have progressively fewer worldly possessions. According to one of the Masters, El Topo is full of self-righteous hate instead of self-effacing love, and should be trying to disappear entirely rather than find himself through violence. The Fourth Master possesses only his own life and chooses to kill himself to prove to El Topo how little life means. Humiliated by his dishonorable victory, El Topo rushes through the desert, smashes his gun, and assumes a Christ-like pose of self-sacrifice as he is gunned down by a Woman in Black (representing El Topo's Jungian alter-ego) who has previously joined their journey and sadistically lusts after Mara. Unable to accept this emasculated man, Mara chooses to ride away with the Woman in Black while El Topo's body is hauled away by a group of deformed people.
(...)
Jodorowsky brought El Topo to New York, where it played for over a year as allegedly the first “midnight movie”, garnering large profits and a considerable cult audience. (Still scandalised by Fando y Lis, Mexico refused to let El Topo represent them at the Cannes Film Festival). John Lennon was so impressed by the film that Beatles manager Allen Klein purchased the distribution rights and would finance much of the budget for Jodorowsky's next film. While some critics in the alternative press proclaimed El Topo as one of the greatest films ever made, more mainstream critics complained that it was an overly violent, pretentious, nonsensical mess of crude surreal imagery with little to say and no goal but exploiting the counterculture. Pauline Kael, for example, accused the film of being “commercialised surrealism” that is ultimately “sanctimonious” and reinforcing of “conventional pieties” in a way that Buñuel's films are not. However, while Buñuel's attacks on religion are primarily confined to Catholicism, Jodorowsky not only violates but de-centres Western religious traditions by creating a hybrid amalgamation of Western, non-Western and occult beliefs. A self-described “atheist mystic”, he has claimed to hate religion (for it “is killing the planet”), but he loves mysticism and occult practices like alchemy. What is important in Jodorowsky's films is not just that (organised) religion's discourses of political power and tradition are attacked and subverted – but also that a hybrid mysticism is elevated in their place, drawing upon a more universal sense of spirituality that underlies all religious and occult beliefs, evading issues of specific nationality and political culture. Interviews with him suggest that he mixes belief systems with a subversively playful attitude, as if constructing his own mythology from so much spiritual raw material.
(...)
Although beyond the scope of this profile, Jodorowsky's work is deserving of further study within the context of Third Cinema, surrealism, magical realism and post-colonial studies. As is the case with many cult/counterculture/underground films, his works have been treated as the foreign/exotic and indefinable “Other” of both commercial and art cinema. While filmmakers of the same era – such as Glauber Rocha, whose Antonio das Mortes (1969) was praised by Jodorowsky and could be seen as an influence on El Topo – were championed by critics, others have remained largely neglected by generations of cultural tastemakers. The truly transgressive and politically viable qualities of Jodorowsky's films have been contained as carnivalesque and exploitative curiosities, almost dismissively relegated to midnight movie circuits and cult film catalogues. Only by re-evaluating these films both within and beyond their place in the cult tradition can we see them as a cohesive body of work evoking a continual spiritual journey and a sustained challenge to the political/religious climate of the Americas.
>
by David Church in SENSES OF CINEMA
>

Jean Cocteau edição de dois filmes fundamentais LE SANG D'UN POÈTE (1930) e ORPHÉE (1950).

(...) In 1929, at the age of 40, Cocteau made his first film. The Vicomte de Noailles, a frequenter of avant-garde salons, asked Cocteau and composer George Auric if they would be interested in collaborating on an animation. Cocteau suggested they make a live-action piece instead. The news that he was making a film must, at the time, have seemed like further evidence of Cocteau's dilettantism. In fact, the result was an avant-garde landmark.
Le Sang d'un poète (Blood of a Poet) is divided into episodes, some connected, some discrete. Perhaps the most famous of these features the eponymous poet moving along a corridor in a hotel, looking through the keyholes of bedroom doors. Through these keyholes, he spies a range of tableaux vivants. These include a bedroom in which a child annoys a governess by crawling up a wall, a Mexican firing squad in which the victim falls to the ground and then bounces back to life, and a dark space in which a couple write observations about each other while they embrace. The work is strongly indebted to (though in no way derivative of) Un Chien Andalou (1929). Its distinct similarity to Buñuel and Dali's film led mainstream commentators to label it as 'surrealistic'. This was of particular annoyance to André Breton, who was now running the Surrealists as if they were Communist cell. Cocteau himself pretended also to take offence at being labelled a Surrealist, though he probably quite enjoyed Breton's irritation. Le Sang d'un poète caused mild controversy, though this was as nothing compared to the controversy that was soon to be caused by Buñuel's L'Age d'or, the second and final film to benefit from the Vicomte de Noaille's artistic philanthropy. Le Sang d'un poète is both a recapitulation and a new beginning. Viewed in the context of Cocteau's previous work, it can be seen as an anthology of his favourite images and themes. These include: mirrors (narcissism), eyes (voyeurism), statues (classicism), doors (the borders between different worlds) and blood (the sufferings of the artist). It also contains numerous elements of autobiography and references to previous works, both overt (for example, the snowball fight from Les Enfants terribles) and coded (for example, the magical 'transportation' of the poet into parallel worlds). Viewed in the context of Cocteau's subsequent career, it can be seen as a sketchbook for future films. Many of the techniques that would later become Cocteau's trademarks were first tried out in Le Sang d'un poète. These include the use of slow and reverse motion, voice-over narration, and the film's most famous trick of building the walls of certain sets on the studio floor. By filming them from above and getting his actors to lie on the ground, Cocteau creates the impression that the walls in his fantasy world emanate a magnetic pull. This last is a startling effect, but Cocteau's liking for it gets the better of him, and he uses it too often. In the end, it is difficult not to agree with Cocteau's own judgement of the film as a theme “clumsily played with one finger” which he would later orchestrate in Orphée. However, despite the film's clumsiness, the child-like delight that Cocteau takes in the possibilities of the medium gives Le Sang d'un poète an energy and playfulness that at the time only Buñuel and Dali surpassed. Cocteau did not direct another film for the next sixteen years. By way of explanation, he later wrote:

The fact that I let twenty years [a typically casual ]exaggeration] elapse between that film, my first, and the others, shows that I regarded it as something rather like a drawing or a poem – a drawing or a poem so expensive that I couldn't contemplate making more than one.

Cocteau's implication that it did not occur to him to make another film is inadequate. Was he scared off by the controversy that his film generated? Did he consider another project but find himself unable to secure funding? Did he feel that he'd used up all his cinematic invention? Or was he still not that interested in film? In the absence of any clear evidence, one can only conjecture. Le Sang d'un poète was Cocteau's last 'controversial' work. As the diplomatic climate darkened in the 1930s and the avant-garde became ever more politicised, Cocteau moved inexorably towards the French literary establishment. He became a prolific columnist and wrote a number of classical stage melodramas including La Machine infernale, L'Aigle à deux têtes and the immensely successful Les Parents terribles.

By the end of the decade, Cocteau the avant-garde provocateur had become Cocteau the celebrity playwright. (...)

Richard Misek in SENSES OF CINEMA

ALLAN DWAN in IWO JIMA

Sands of Iwo Jima (1949) de Allan Dwan
SANDS OF IWO JIMA _ John Wayne catapulted from Hollywood leading man to All-American hero with his Oscar-nominated performance as Sgt. Sryker, a hard-nosed Marine sergeant who must mold a company of raw recruits into a combat-ready fighting machine. Feared by many and hated by all, Stryker's training is soon put to the test in a full-scale assault against the Japanese on Iwo Jima - an infamous battle that will live forever in one of cinema's most famous scenes, the flag-raising on Mt. Suribachi.

Excelente filme para rever agora que Clint Eastwood filmou a revisão deste mito americano nos recentes Letters from Iwo Jima e Flags of Our Fathers.

HERZOG & de MEURON _ Beijing Olympic Stadium

Beijing Olympic Stadium by Herzog & de Meuron
13 designs were on showcase to the public of beijing, which could vote for their favorite design. 3 designs entered the final. the swiss office of herzog and de meuron captured the hearts of the public with their "nest-like" architecture. the beijing architecture design institute and japanese studio axs were the other two finalists. the exterior “nest-like” appearance is caused by curved steel-net walls. which enclose the stadium. the immense structure of the stadium will hold 80,000 seats and construction works will begin by the end of 2003 and be finished before the beginning of the 2008 beijing olympic games where it will have a leading role as national stadium.
>
architects: jacques herzog and pierre de meuron
location: beijing, china

>

>

SARKOZY SHOW

Entretien avec Nicolas SARKOZY in LIBÉRATION.fr 12.04.2007
>
Partagez-vous cette conviction chiraquienne qu'une présidentielle se gagne dans les quinze derniers jours ?
Non. Elle peut se perdre dans les quinze derniers jours. C'est très différent. Depuis des années, on répète que je suis parti trop vite, que je vais exploser. La vérité, c'est que ma stratégie est simple : j'ai commencé à fond et je n'ai cessé d'accélérer.
Vous vous droitisez pour rassembler votre camp au premier tour ?
Vous vous trompez sur la situation de la France. Un électeur de gauche a autant besoin qu'on lui parle de la nation qu'un électeur de droite. Dire que les ouvriers se droitisent est une absurdité. Quelle est la vraie caractéristique de cette campagne ?
C'est que les gens ne se mobilisent pas sur des mesures mais sur des valeurs, sur le sens. Mais si je veux être tout à fait honnête, Ségolène est plus à droite que Jospin, je suis plus à droite que Chirac, Bayrou est plus à droite que Lecanuet. Finalement, celui qui est moins à droite qu'avant, c'est Le Pen !
Le «ministère de l'immigration et de l'identité nationale» a choqué à gauche, mais aussi à droite...
Cela n'a rien d'une provocation. Il faut parler de l'immigration et de l'intégration en même temps. Lévi-Strauss, le plus grand anthropologue français, a dit que «l'identité n'est pas une pathologie». Si vous ne mettez pas la question de l'identité dans la question de l'immigration, alors qu'est-ce que vous dites aux immigrés qui veulent devenir français sur ce qu'est la France ?
Cette revendication d'un ministère figure dans le seul programme du Front National.
Ce n'est pas parce que Le Pen touche quelque chose que cela devient interdit. Les gens se demandent ce que c'est qu'être français ? Ceux qui arrivent viennent avec leur identité ; on ne leur parle pas de l'identité de la France. Je propose de leur parler de l'identité de la France et de rassembler les deux concepts. Il y a un problème d'immigration, avec un système d'intégration qui ne marche plus.
Mais la plupart des immigrés s'intègrent...
Le voile, les «grands frères», les mariages forcés, la communauté turque dont certaines femmes ne parlent pas un mot de français, les nouveaux venus qui vivent entre eux, les quartiers difficiles avec des ghettos, tout cela, c'est une invention de ma part ?
Vous voulez récupérer l'électorat de Le Pen ?
Quand je dis : «Je veux convaincre les ouvriers de voter pour moi», personne ne m'attaque. Quand on dit : «Attention ! Il veut récupérer l'électeur du Front national», alors là, on tremble ! Au nom de quoi récupérer les électeurs du FN, c'est mal ?
Cela dépend des moyens que l'on emploie...
Il n'y a aucun moyen que j'emploie qui n'est pas républicain. Je me présente à des élections, je fais des discours importants. Je vais chercher ces électeurs en leur disant : «Vous êtes libres de voter pour qui vous voulez mais le vote FN est inutile.»
Pourquoi avoir abandonné votre idée d'accorder le droit de vote aux élections locales aux immigrés ? Ce serait un facteur d'intégration...
A titre personnel, je suis pour. Mais c'est une idée qui, aujourd'hui, cristallise les passions, raidit les positions.
Vous inquiétez un électorat de centre droit séduit par Bayrou...
François Bayrou est devenu un candidat de gauche. Il le dit lui-même. Je ne sais pas si je suis un candidat de droite qui inquiète, mais depuis Pompidou pas un candidat de droite n'a fait de tels résultats dans les études d'opinion. A la même époque en 2002, Jacques Chirac était à 21 %. La démocratie a besoin d'un vrai débat gauche-droite. C'est la dangerosité de Bayrou. A partir du moment où on nie le débat gauche-droite, on ouvre un champ béant aux extrêmes.
La position de Bayrou entre les deux tours vous inquiète ?
Il prendra les positions qu'il veut. Je rappelle qu'il y a les législatives après. Il faut bien qu'il fasse une alliance, soit avec la gauche, soit avec la droite. Sinon, comment sont élus ses députés ?
Si vous gagnez, Bayrou peut-il être un de vos ministres ?
François Bayrou a beaucoup pratiqué l'insulte, pas moi. Je sais bien qu'il faudra rassembler. J'attends les résultats du premier tour pour décider la stratégie du second. Reconnaissez que c'est curieux, un candidat qui dit : «Si je suis face à Royal, je rassemblerai la droite, si je suis face à Sarkozy, je rassemblerai la gauche.» C'est même la caricature du cynisme et de l'opportunisme !
Au second tour, serait-il plus redoutable que Ségolène Royal ?
Le second tour est redoutable quoi qu'il arrive. Pendant six mois, on m'a expliqué que Ségolène Royal était imbattable parce que c'était une femme, qu'elle souriait, qu'elle était moderne. Les mêmes expliquent aujourd'hui qu'elle ne peut pas gagner. Ils avaient tort hier, ils ont tort aujourd'hui. Quant à François Bayrou, j'attends de voir, s'il est au second tour, sa capacité à rassembler l'électorat de gauche...
C'est vous le meilleur argument pour le rassembler ?
Le «tout sauf Sarkozy» ? Je sais que c'est l'idée que vous caressez, mais où en trouvez-vous l'illustration ? Où sont ces manifestations contre moi ?
Il y a eu le déplacement à la Croix-Rousse, à Lyon, que vous avez annulé...
La Croix-Rousse, c'est extraordinaire ! Il y avait quarante militants d'extrême gauche. C'est ça, le référendum anti-Sarkozy ?
S'ils n'étaient que 40, pourquoi avoir reculé ?
Vous croyez que je veux faire le 20 Heures avec des images de violence autour de moi ? Vous pensez que j'ai assez peu d'expérience pour tomber dans ce piège ?
Vous n'irez donc pas en banlieue contrairement à ce que vous aviez annoncé ?
Vous n'avez cessé d'expliquer que j'instrumentalisais la banlieue en y allant avec des caméras. Depuis quelques mois, j'y vais moins, et vous expliquez que j'ai tort ! Vous agitez la muleta mais je sais qu'il y a un mur derrière, je ne suis pas obligé de me jeter dedans !
Pourquoi avoir déclaré que la pédophilie était génétique ?
Je n'ai pas dit exactement cela. J'ai expliqué que tout ne dépendait pas de l'acquis, mais qu'une partie pouvait être de l'inné. Dans quelle proportion ? Je ne suis pas savant. Par exemple, quand j'étais enfant, j'étais choqué parce que l'on expliquait, quand un enfant était homosexuel : «Sa mère a eu tort, elle a dormi avec lui». Quand un enfant était anorexique, on disait : «Le père était absent.» Quand un enfant était autiste, on disait : «Oh là ! Les parents ont divorcé, cela a provoqué un choc.» Depuis, on sait que l'autisme, c'est génétique. Je pense aussi que la sexualité est une identité.
Vous avez dit que vous étiez né hétérosexuel...
Oui, je suis né hétérosexuel. Je ne me suis jamais posé la question du choix de ma sexualité. C'est pour cela que la position de l'Eglise consistant à dire «l'homosexualité est un péché» est choquante. On ne choisit pas son identité. Vous, à quinze ans, vous vous êtes demandé : «Au fond, suis-je homosexuel ou hétérosexuel ?»
Vous pensez qu'on exagère la part de l'acquis dans la mentalité contemporaine ?
On a l'identité qu'on a. De la même façon qu'il y a des gens qui ont tendance à grossir et d'autres pas, des chauves et des chevelus, des petits et des grands... Nous sommes six millions de migraineux. C'est totalement héréditaire. Ma mère était migraineuse, mes fils sont migraineux. C'est un patrimoine génétique.
Si on surestime l'acquis , c'est encore un méfait de cette «idéologie soixante-huitarde» que vous exécrez ?
Non. Le 68 que je dénonce, c'est le relativisme : tout se vaut. L'erreur fondamentale de 68, c'est de ne pas avoir compris que la transgression de la règle amène à la création. Si vous supprimez la règle, il n'y a plus de beau et de mal, tout se vaut.
Votre programme fiscal ne sert pas vraiment les catégories populaires. La suppression des droits de succession, c'est un beau cadeau pour les riches ?
L'égalité des chances, ce n'est pas d'aller prendre le patrimoine de celui qui a la chance de naître dans une famille où il y a un patrimoine, c'est de faire en sorte que celui qui naît dans une famille où il n'y a pas de patrimoine puisse en acquérir un. Il n'est pas illégitime que des parents qui ont travaillé toute leur vie transmettent quelque chose à leurs enfants. Que doit faire la République pour garantir l'égalité des chances ? Non pas retirer le patrimoine de celui qui a des parents qui l'ont gagné, mais donner plus à celui qui n'a pas de patrimoine. Moi, je suis pour que la République corrige les inégalités en promouvant ceux qui n'ont rien. Vous, vous êtes pour que la République corrige les inégalités en faisant reculer ceux qui ont un patrimoine.
Le «Canard enchaîné» révèle que vous avez promis à Chirac d'éteindre les poursuites à son égard après la fin de son mandat ?
C'est faux et grotesque !
Quand allez-vous rendre public votre patrimoine comme vous l'aviez promis ?
La seule chose que j'ai, c'est le produit de la vente de l'appartement que je possédais et les parts que j'ai dans mon cabinet d'avocats. Les dividendes que j'ai touchés à ce titre, très modestes, ont été également publiés. Le directeur général des Impôts a dit : «S'agissant de l'ISF de M. Sarkozy, nous pouvons certifier qu'il n'y a aucun problème.» Je suis le seul candidat dont on ait dit cela. Il n'y a rien, aucun secret. Je n'ai pas de société civile immobilière.
Cette campagne, elle est plus dure que vous le pensiez, comme le disait François Bayrou ?
Non, plutôt moins. L'affaire Clearstream était lourde pour moi. Et puis la campagne, à vrai dire, a commencé en 2002.
Cinq ans de primaires à droite ?
Oui, Chirac, Villepin, Raffarin, Alliot-Marie, c'est cinq ans de primaires ! Et il reste quinze jours...

MICHAEL SNOW _ prize

Canadian experimental filmmaker and contemporary artist Michael Snow will be honored with the first MoCCA Award in Contemporary Art. The ten-thousand-dollar MoCCA Award, from the Museum of Contemporary Canadian Art in Toronto, is being awarded to Snow for lifetime achievement in innovative contemporary art. Toronto-based Snow, seventy-eight years old, works in painting, sculpture, video, films, photography, holography, drawing, books, and music.

TATI _ MON ONCLE no cinema

WHAT LOOKS GOOD IN THE WEEK END

DANIEL BARROCA expo

No Museu da Electricidade DANIEL BARROCA apresenta novos trabalhos - uma projecção de slides e desenhos - na exposição LAMA.

>

Museu da Electricidade

Avenida Brasília_1300-598 LISBOA

de 19 de Abril a 20 de Maio de 2007

terça a domingo das 10h à 01h

PROPOSTAS DA ARTE PORTUGUESA. POSIÇÃO:2007 _LIVRO E CONFERÊNCIA

Lançamento do livro Propostas da Arte Portuguesa. Posição: 2007

editado por Miguel von Hafe Pérez, volume IX da Colecção Público / Serralves

>

DEBATE 27 ABR 2007, 18h30 MUSEU DE SERRALVES

Entrada gratuita

O que significa ser artista hoje em Portugal?

Modos de produção, canais de difusão e plataformas de recepção. Por ocasião do lançamento deste volume da Colecção de Arte Contemporânea Público Serralves, debate com Carla Cruz, Daniel Barroca, Eduardo Matos, Isabel Carvalho, Manuel Santos Maia, Mafalda Santos, Pedro Barateiro.

Propostas da Arte Portuguesa. Posição: 2007 traça um percurso através da obra de um conjunto de artistas que utilizam meios tão diversificados como a pintura, a escultura, o vídeo, o desenho, a instalação, a fotografia ou a performance para demarcarem territórios de uma singularidade absoluta. Este livro propõe uma reflexão sobre os modos de produção e partilha da arte contemporânea, a afirmação dos artistas enquanto criadores de plataformas de visibilidade própria e o impacto da utilização da imagem em movimento na produção e recepção da arte actual.

Apresentação do livro e moderação do debate por Miguel von Hafe Pérez, crítico de arte e comissário de exposições, actualmente responsável pelo projecto www.anamnese.pt da Fundação Ilídio Pinho, onde integra o Conselho das Artes que está a constituir uma colecção de arte contemporânea portuguesa.

>

Propostas da Arte Portuguesa. Posição: 2007 estará disponível no dia 30 de Abril juntamente com o Jornal Público.

ELEIÇÕES FRANCESAS_SARKO ?

Brevemente vamos conhecer qual o próximo presidente_SARKO ?

fotografia enviada de Paris por Ângelo Ferreira de Sousa.